Part 4 HCC Coding and Reimbursement Explained with Examples: How Accurate Coding Impacts Revenue

How HCC Coding Impacts Reimbursement: Real Examples of Revenue Gain and Loss

This is Part 4 of your HCC blog series,

Healthcare providers who work with Medicare Advantage (MA) patients or Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) know that Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) coding directly affects reimbursement. Unlike hospital billing with DRGs (where CCs/MCCs drive revenue), HCC coding is all about risk adjustment. Each chronic condition contributes a risk weight that determines how much funding a health plan receives to care for a patient over a year.

Let’s break down how it works — and how missing, overcoding, or undercoding can cost thousands of dollars.

1. Each Chronic Condition = a Risk Weight

Every chronic diagnosis has an assigned risk adjustment factor (RAF). The more complex or costly the condition, the higher the weight.

Example – Diabetes:

• E11.9 – Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications

  • Risk Weight ≈ 0.105

• E11.22 – Type 2 Diabetes with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)

  • Risk Weight ≈ 0.318

 If a plan receives $10,000 base rate per patient per year, then:

• Coding E11.9 only = $10,000 × (1 + 0.105) = $11,050

• Coding E11.22 (diabetes with CKD) = $10,000 × (1 + 0.318) = $13,180

 Revenue impact of undercoding (missing CKD): $2,130 per patient, per year.

2. Conditions Are Grouped into HCC Categories

HCCs are hierarchical. This means more severe conditions replace less severe ones in the same family. You don’t get paid twice — but you do get credit for the highest complexity.

Example – Diabetes Hierarchy:

• HCC 19: Diabetes without complication

• HCC 18: Diabetes with complication

 If a patient has E11.9 and E11.22, only HCC 18 (with complication) is counted.

This prevents double counting but ensures the true severity is captured. Missing the higher-level code = lost revenue.

3. Final Risk Score = Sum of Weights

A patient’s total RAF score is the sum of all active HCCs. That score is multiplied by the base payment rate to determine reimbursement.

Example – Patient with Multiple Chronic Conditions

Diagnosis	ICD-10-CM Code	HCC	Risk Weight
Diabetes with CKD	E11.22	HCC 18	0.318
COPD	J44.9	HCC 111	0.346
CHF	I50.9	HCC 85	0.323

RAF Score = 0.318 + 0.346 + 0.323 = 0.987

 If base rate = $10,000 → $19,870 reimbursement per year

Now imagine if the coder missed the CKD link with diabetes (E11.9 coded instead of E11.22):

• RAF drops from 0.987 → 0.774

• Reimbursement = $17,740

 Revenue loss: $2,130 per patient, per year. Multiply by 100 patients = $213,000 lost.

---

Revenue Impact: Missing, Overcoding, and Undercoding

1. Undercoding (too vague / not linking complications):

   • Example: Coding “diabetes unspecified” instead of “diabetes with CKD.”

   • Loss: $2,000+ per patient annually.

2. Missing diagnoses:

   • If CKD, CHF, COPD are not captured, RAF score plummets.

   • Loss: $5,000–$10,000 per patient per year depending on conditions.

3. Overcoding (coding conditions not supported by documentation):

   • Short-term gain but high audit risk.

   • CMS may claw back payments + penalties.

Why Accuracy Matters

HCC coding isn’t about inflating reimbursement — it’s about accurately reflecting patient complexity.

• Health plans receive funding to cover true costs.

• Providers get resources for high-risk patients.

• Patients benefit when their conditions are fully recognized and managed.

Bottom Line:

• Accurate HCC coding = fair reimbursement.

• Missed codes = lost revenue.

• Overcoding = audit risk.

Getting it right can mean a difference of thousands of dollars per patient per year.